500多个美国律师讨论，用AI辅助，一小时还收975美元是不是合适

 

下面很多公司法务和律师跟帖。

人气第一的说：AI这么好用，大公司都在扩建自己的法务团队，律所的好日子到头了。

I do expect AI to be the death of the billable hour. I can see big companies slightly expanding their in-house teams and ditching their Big Law outside counsel.

也有嘴硬的，认为法律的灰色地带很多，AI取代不了律师。

我自己认识的很多中国律师也是这么想的。

Legal work is often situated in grey areas of "fairness" and morality. I don't think AI is ever going to be the resource or arbitrator for such questions.

这个美国律师说，他们已经不按照时间收钱了。客户现在都要求一口价。看来美国法律界也开始卷了。

If there's a way to kill the billable, I'll be first on board. I mentioned elsewhere, but a lot of what we're doing is fixed fee now, which clients love. Some things that are more ambiguous, need to be billable. Unless clients start paying a monthly subscription for BigLaw? I'm not sure of the solution just yet.

还有个公司法务的评论有点意思：现在法律工作者不使用AI，就像医生相信自己的经验而不相信手术流程表。

Everyone else claims it can't do anything to help them. Reminds me of surgeons who refuse to follow basic infection control checklists because they think someone of their brilliance doesn't need checklists