HuaRenCa
Back to Forum
Community

Can we put all the stock-picking posts into a separate hidden section?

丁文凯
丁文凯

1 day ago

Just being blunt here, but several of the stock-picking posts on this forum really give off that "fresh meat" vibe.

Could we put all the stock-picking posts into a separate hidden section? A lot of international students here don't have much money, and if they get trapped in a bad investment, it could really mess up their lives.

7
1.6K

Comments (7)

Your avatar
Sign in to comment
yenkizliman
yenkizliman1 day ago

I think concentrating stock-recommendation posts into a hidden section might actually make them harder to monitor. It would be better to add a risk-disclaimer tag and let readers decide for themselves whether to click in.

雨中泛舟
雨中泛舟1 day ago

Could you give some examples of the specific IDs that posted these stock recommendation posts? That way, our discussion can be more targeted.

易幻
易幻1 day ago

Hiding a separate section isn't the answer—what matters is having someone moderate it. If those posts stay up, sooner or later someone will click through, and when they lose money, they'll have no one to blame but themselves.

millet_十号
millet_十号23 hours ago

It's true that international students don't have much money, so that's worth keeping in mind. But some people just use small amounts to test the waters, and they won't necessarily get stuck—it depends on how much of their funds they put in.

西风独自良
西风独自良14 hours ago

People from different schools and social circles vary widely in their risk tolerance, so it's impossible to generalize.

panghu888
panghu88810 hours ago

If you're really worried about people getting scammed, you could suggest the forum add a report button so experienced users can flag suspicious posts. The catch is that moderators have to be willing to act on reports promptly—otherwise the button won't do much good.

艾大米
艾大米4 hours ago

What exactly does "the leek smell" mentioned in the main text refer to? Is it that the sales pitch is too exaggerated, or that it only talks about returns and not risks? Only by clarifying this can we address the problem effectively.