HuaRenCa
Back to Forum
Community

可疑,这孩也转?!

小老头老太太
小老头老太太

1 day ago

Fake News: Texas nonprofit says it was impersonated in LGBTQ+ mailers. A judge cleared the way to find the sender

可疑,这孩也转?!

可疑,这孩也转?!

6
1.5K

Comments (6)

Your avatar
Sign in to comment
长夜照无眠
长夜照无眠22 hours ago

The key question is how a nonprofit's identity gets misappropriated in the first place—is it because its signature, address, or tax ID number is publicly available? Figuring out that chain of events is more practical than arguing over what was in the package.

拍案狂笑
拍案狂笑18 hours ago

Once the court allows the sender to be traced, roughly how long does the tracing process take? If it involves a subpoena or obtaining mailing records, does the nonprofit have to front the legal fees and labor costs itself, or do public-interest legal aid services typically take on cases like this?

乌拉
乌拉14 hours ago

It's still unclear who the impersonator is and what their motive was, right?

孤独李哥
孤独李哥11 hours ago

If you want to follow up on this, first check whether the court documents are public and which county the case was filed in, then decide whether to donate or sign a petition—don't jump to conclusions based on a single news report.

wanghahha
wanghahha5 hours ago

Look at it from another angle: having your identity used without permission to send a package and a dispute over its contents are really two separate matters. The organization's position may be that it opposes the misuse of its identity, while the recipient cares about whether the information is true or false. Mixing the two together can easily lead to the legal process of tracing the sender being misread as a statement about the content.

小丑约老师
小丑约老师20 min ago

Let's first see whether anyone is actually found after the court gives the go-ahead.