Community

If It's Still Human Review in the End, What's the Point of Multi-Agent?

2 months ago

Multi-agent collaboration sounds nice, but I'm skeptical about its actual effectiveness. One AI writes code, another reviews it, and another runs tests. This closed loop seems self-consistent, but if the first agent writes a hidden bug, the reviewing agent doesn't catch it, and the testing agent doesn't cover it, who takes the blame for the final merged code? I still prefer to review it myself.

rjhuantan· 2 months ago

AI Agent的最后归宿：功能趋同，还是殊途同归？

会不会有个趋势，后面的Agent，做到最后，功能都趋于一致。上手ZCodex我感觉和codx异曲同工呀。使用体验如下：这到底是什么ZCode是智谱AI（Zhipu AI）推出的AI编程助手，刚发布的3.0版本深度适配了GLM-5.2模型。它的定位不是另一个IDE插件——它是一个桌面端的AI编程Agent，能理解项目结构、规划代码架构、写代码、跑测试...

Comments (2)

sanqi2 months ago

The remote wake-up feature really hits the spot for me. I often travel outside, and sometimes inspiration strikes when I'm not at my computer, and by the time I get back, I've forgotten it. ZCode's WeChat Bot is like having a "coding assistant" on standby 24/7. Just send a message and it gets to work, perfect for freelancers. However, I'm a bit concerned about security—what if the bot misoperates and crashes my production environment?

meisan2 months ago

I had the same concerns at first, but after using it for two weeks, I found that the value of multi-agent is not about being "perfect", but about "keeping obvious low-level errors out". For example, grammatical errors, unused variables, null pointers, and other small issues that are easy to overlook with the naked eye, the review agent can basically catch them. As for deep-level bugs in logic, I still go through them myself. Treat it as an auxiliary tool, not a hands-off manager, and the experience is still good.